What contrast exists regarding the tenure of a player in the City of Zokor versus the real Zokor in its habitat?

The player's tenure is typically short and intense until objectives are secured, whereas the animal remains in a suitable area for its entire lifespan.

The underlying purpose dictating the concept of 'location' strongly influences the expected duration of stay. For the biological Zokor, its habitat is a long-term residence; it remains in an area that meets environmental parameters for survival throughout its entire lifespan, exhibiting endurance by adapting its behavior to minor fluctuations within that established range. In sharp contrast, the City of Zokor is designed as a transient hurdle for the game player. Once the necessary Relics or high-value strategic components are successfully obtained, the player is expected to move on, treating the zone as a completed task rather than a final destination. This highlights the difference between biological perpetuation and digital achievement.