How does the high-resolution data from Mishka's remains contrast with the evidence from Hot Springs, South Dakota?
Answer
Mishka reveals how they moved through habitat, while Hot Springs indicates *that* they were present.
The evidence from Hot Springs, South Dakota, specifically its rich concentration of fossils, suggests a localized mass accumulation site or graveyard, which tells researchers *that* mammoths were present in that location at a specific time. In contrast, the isotopic analysis performed on the remains of an Alaskan individual like Mishka, discovered near Fairbanks, provides high-resolution data regarding the animal's life history. This localized study allows researchers to analyze its isotopic signature to gain clues about the ancient trails, movements, and specific environments it traversed across Alaska during its life.
Related Questions
Which continents comprised the immense geographical area of the woolly mammoth's ancient domain?What specific biome dictated the historical distribution of Mammuthus primigenius across continents?Which US state location yielded woolly mammoth remains in a gravel pit, indicating southern roaming?Where were woolly mammoth remains recovered submerged off the coasts of Oregon and California?What landmass, connecting Siberia and Alaska, was the core heartland of the woolly mammoth population?What island served as the most famous final stronghold where small woolly mammoth populations persisted?Until approximately how many years ago did woolly mammoths survive on the isolated Wrangel Island refuge?How does the high-resolution data from Mishka's remains contrast with the evidence from Hot Springs, South Dakota?What paleontological feature, growing incrementally, is analyzed to map out vast seasonal movements across Siberia and Alaska?What combination of pressures likely caused the final extinction event after mainland populations vanished?What primary food sources characterized the diet of mammoths inhabiting the cold grasslands of Beringia?