How does the reputed size of Bathysphaera intacta compare to known Stomiidae measurements?

Answer

It is an order of magnitude greater

There is a vast discrepancy between the established size range of scientifically cataloged deep-sea dragonfish belonging to the *Stomiidae* family and the size attributed to the legendary *Bathysphaera intacta*. Typical, known dragonfish specimens usually range from just a few inches up to perhaps a foot or slightly more in length. When compared to the rumored dimensions of the Giant Dragonfish, the latter is suggested to be vastly larger, representing a scale difference described as an order of magnitude greater. This huge disparity underscores why the *Bathysphaera* remains classified in cryptozoology archives rather than recognized ichthyology, as its supposed mass far exceeds the known biological limits for the family.

How does the reputed size of Bathysphaera intacta compare to known Stomiidae measurements?

Related Questions

When was the Bathysphaera intacta Giant Dragonfish allegedly observed?What vessel was utilized during the 1932 observation of the Giant Dragonfish?What staggering depth was cited for the single observation of Bathysphaera intacta?What feature characterizes established deep-sea dragonfish like those in the Stomiidae family?How does the reputed size of Bathysphaera intacta compare to known Stomiidae measurements?What specific weight, associated with a trapping event and geoduck bait, is sometimes attributed to a Giant Dragon Fish?The 640-meter depth recorded for Bathysphaera is near the boundary of which two ocean zones?What type of evidence primarily supports the 1932 Bathysphaera sighting versus the 75kg specimen report?What crucial element is missing for the 1932 Bathysphaera sighting to gain formal taxonomic classification?Reaching 75 kilograms in the aphotic zone suggests what ecological strategy for the alleged Giant Dragon Fish?
animalsizefishDragonfish