How did the geographical distribution of Arctodus contrast with the ranges of the modern Grizzly or American Black Bear?
Answer
The ranges of modern bears are generally more constrained by factors like forest cover.
The sheer geographic breadth of *Arctodus* contrasts with the modern Grizzly and American Black Bear, whose ranges are typically more constrained by factors such as specific vegetation density or forest cover.
Related Questions
What is the scientific name for the giant short-faced bear?Across which period was the near-total continental coverage of Arctodus simus evident?What was the approximate northernmost limit of the confirmed habitation zone for Arctodus simus?What environmental condition characterized the Beringian habitat where Arctodus was found?Which American Midwest state provided fossil remains that help fill in the central corridor of the bear's range?What feature in New Mexico represented one of the southern extremities of the bear's documented North American range?What does the successful persistence of Arctodus across significant climate fluctuation suggest about the species?What hypothesis is supported by the tall, long-legged morphology of Arctodus simus?If Arctodus was a generalist across the continent's broadest strokes, what did that suggest about its essential survival requirements?How did the geographical distribution of Arctodus contrast with the ranges of the modern Grizzly or American Black Bear?What does the comparison of confirmed fossil localities reveal about the distribution density of Arctodus?What event coincided with the final disappearance of the giant short-faced bear?