When assessing true dominance or physical power in bears, which dimension is arguably the more important factor than height?
Answer
Mass
Mass is argued to be the more important factor when assessing true dominance or physical power, even though *Arctodus simus* clearly led in height.
#Videos
The Bear That Was As Large As The Allosaurus - YouTube
Related Questions
When did the giant short-faced bear (*Arctodus simus*) vanish from the fossil record?What is the estimated maximum standing height for the giant short-faced bear?What peculiar skeletal feature gave the *Arctodus simus* its common name?During which geological epoch did the massive *Arctodus simus* thrive across North America?How does the maximum standing height of *Arctodus simus* compare to a standard indoor basketball hoop?Which extinct species is identified as the South American counterpart belonging to the short-faced lineage?How do the weight estimates for *Arctodus simus* compare to the heaviest recorded modern bears?What lifestyle interpretation is supported by the robust skull and shortened muzzle of *Arctodus simus*?When assessing true dominance or physical power in bears, which dimension is arguably the more important factor than height?Which massive bear species is cited as the largest living terrestrial carnivore?Which conclusion about *Arctodus simus* is strongly supported by paleontological evidence regarding its stature?