What is the primary implication of the recent genetic revision concerning the five recognized species?
Answer
Their specific distributions and ecological roles may differ
The taxonomic split into five species means that while they are all *Naja* species, their specific geographical distributions and the ecological roles they play in their respective environments are now understood to differ.
Related Questions
Which genus do cobras commonly referred to as "true cobras" belong to, separating them from the King Cobra?What significant taxonomic revision regarding *Naja melanoleuca* was introduced in research published in 2018?What is the shared, defining physical characteristic of the snakes grouped as "true cobras"?What is the maximum length that forest cobras are cited as sometimes exceeding?What common identifier is often used for the forest cobra due to its usual dark coloration?Which habitat preference is reflected in the term "forest" in the cobra's name?Which genus does the King Cobra belong to, setting it apart from the forest cobra?What is the primary implication of the recent genetic revision concerning the five recognized species?What physical aptitude, besides terrestrial movement, does the forest cobra possess that aids its varied diet?Historically, what was the forest cobra recognized as within the *Naja* genus before the taxonomic revision?