What ecological trade-off forces the unau into a low-energy lifestyle?
Answer
The subsequent digestive effort burns more calories than the food provides
High-energy foraging would be counterproductive because the subsequent digestive effort burns more calories than the food provides, necessitating an extremely low energy expenditure lifestyle.
Related Questions
What is the strict dietary classification of the Linnaeus's two-toed sloth (unau)?What food category forms the primary staple and bulk of the unau's daily food intake?Due to their slow digestive process, approximately how long can a single meal take to pass completely through the unau's system?The unau's large, multi-chambered stomach functions primarily as what type of biological processing unit?What foraging behavior demonstrates the unau's tendency to rely on learned knowledge about local flora?Compared to the three-toed sloth, what is generally true about the unau's digestive rate?What specific substance found in leaves must be broken down by specialized bacteria within the unau's digestive system?What ecological trade-off forces the unau into a low-energy lifestyle?According to the dietary composition table, which food item is consumed with a Low to Moderate likelihood by the unau?If fruit becomes seasonally abundant, what will the slightly more adaptable unau likely do compared to its relative?Besides moisture derived from food, what direct action must an unau take to obtain water from sources like streams?