How does the energy cost of capturing migrating fish generally compare to hunting large ungulates?
Answer
It can be a much lower-cost activity
Intercepting dense schools of migrating fish requires less sustained exertion and carries a lower inherent risk of injury compared to pursuing large, fleet-footed herbivores.
Related Questions
What is commonly considered the backbone of the diet for many wolf populations globally?What are the traditional primary prey items for Arctic wolves roaming the deep north?What type of feeder are wolves characterized as, enabling them to utilize diverse food sources?Which fish species are explicitly mentioned as major food sources for coastal wolf populations in the Pacific Northwest?What direct observation confirms fish consumption by Arctic wolves in the far north?What ecological process describes the transfer of oceanic energy inland via wolf predation on salmon?What crucial element is deposited into the soil via the discarded carcasses and scat of wolves feeding on salmon?How does the energy cost of capturing migrating fish generally compare to hunting large ungulates?What defining characteristic allows wolves to thrive by utilizing varied survival strategies tailored to local conditions?Where is the reliance of certain wolf populations on spawning salmon runs well-documented?