According to the FWS 2016 rule, what impact did the adoption of *Cyclura lewisi* have on existing Endangered Species Act protections?
Answer
The rule did not alter the regulatory protections afforded under the Endangered Species Act.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service explicitly stated that the 2016 final rule adopting the species name did not change the existing regulatory protections under the Endangered Species Act.
Related Questions
To which Linnaean Order does the Blue Iguana belong?When was the Blue Iguana first formally described by Chapman Grant?What was the designation assigned to the iguana by Albert Schwartz and Richard Thomas in 1975?Who supported the decision in 2004 to elevate the taxon to the full species rank of *Cyclura lewisi*?Which two species are typically cited as the closest relatives to *Cyclura lewisi*?What was the main scientific evidence driving the recognition of *C. lewisi* as a distinct species?What standardized common name did the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service adopt in 2016 for regulatory consistency?Which other iguana species causes public confusion on Grand Cayman due to its abundance?What taxonomic rank did the Blue Iguana hold for much of the 20th century?According to the FWS 2016 rule, what impact did the adoption of *Cyclura lewisi* have on existing Endangered Species Act protections?