What does the robust build and implied crushing power of *A. simus* suggest regarding its feeding strategy?
Answer
It was capable of brute force, perhaps ambushing prey or securing large carcasses from rivals
The anatomy suggests the bear was built for explosive power and brute force, useful for winning resource battles or rapidly processing large amounts of food, rather than long-distance running.
Related Questions
What is the provisional name given to the smaller, island-dwelling short-faced bear species identified around 2020?Which famous geological site in Los Angeles yielded significant remains of the mainland Giant Short-Faced Bear (*A. simus*)?Approximately when did the mainland Giant Short-Faced Bear (*A. simus*) vanish from the North American record?How is the evolutionary path of *Arctodus* generally described in relation to living bear species?What was the estimated maximum weight male *Arctodus simus* could reach?The smaller size observed in the Channel Islands species, *Arctodus angustus*, is a classic example of what evolutionary process?What does the robust build and implied crushing power of *A. simus* suggest regarding its feeding strategy?What geographic contrast exists between the primary habitats of *Arctodus simus* and *Arctodus angustus*?How does the extinction timing of the island species, *Arctodus angustus*, compare to the mainland *A. simus*?What feature suggested *A. simus* was built for confrontation?